Insights
Hindsight is 20/20: JM Assets and the Blow to Tax Certainty
Published on July 17, 2025
5 minute read
As seen in Procedurally Taxing - Tax Notes Federal
In this article, the first of a two-part series, Managing Director Jenni Black examines the Tax Court opinion in JM Assets, and she argues that by determining reg. section 301.6235-1(b)(2)(i) is “invalid,” the court opinion removes quite a bit of certainty for both taxpayers and the government.
Explore the second article of the series as Jenni continues her examination of JM Assets LP, questions whether the Tax Court actually held reg. section 301.6235-1(b)(2) was invalid and discusses the impact the opinion has on tax certainty.
Latest Articles
Insights
Published July 06, 2026
Why Relationships, Not Price, Will Define Growth in Manufacturing
Read More
Insights
Published July 02, 2026
Building What’s Next: Strategic Shifts Redefining Accounting — Accounting Insiders Interview with Citrin Cooperman CEO Alan Badey
Read More
Insights
Published June 24, 2026
Executive Order to Strengthen Customs Enforcement
Read More
Insights
Published June 23, 2026
The Risks of Auditing AI Without a Rulebook
Read More


