Insights
Hindsight is 20/20: JM Assets and the Blow to Tax Certainty
Published on July 17, 2025
5 minute read
As seen in Procedurally Taxing - Tax Notes Federal
In this article, the first of a two-part series, Managing Director Jenni Black examines the Tax Court opinion in JM Assets, and she argues that by determining reg. section 301.6235-1(b)(2)(i) is “invalid,” the court opinion removes quite a bit of certainty for both taxpayers and the government.
Explore the second article of the series as Jenni continues her examination of JM Assets LP, questions whether the Tax Court actually held reg. section 301.6235-1(b)(2) was invalid and discusses the impact the opinion has on tax certainty.
Latest Articles
Insights
Published November 13, 2026
From Outlook to Action: Highlights from Citrin Cooperman’s 2026 New England Economic Summit
Read More
Insights
Published November 12, 2026
Getting Your Habitat Affiliate’s Financial House in Order: Conversations with John Eusanio and Izett Barnett
Read More
Insights
Published November 12, 2026
'Tis the Season for Charitable Donations and Tax Deductions
Read More
Insights
Published November 12, 2026
Tax Planning Should Start Before a South Florida Real Estate Investment Is Made to Optimize Outcomes
Read More


