Insights
Hindsight is 20/20: JM Assets and the Blow to Tax Certainty
Published on July 17, 2025
5 minute read
As seen in Procedurally Taxing - Tax Notes Federal
In this article, the first of a two-part series, Managing Director Jenni Black examines the Tax Court opinion in JM Assets, and she argues that by determining reg. section 301.6235-1(b)(2)(i) is “invalid,” the court opinion removes quite a bit of certainty for both taxpayers and the government.
Explore the second article of the series as Jenni continues her examination of JM Assets LP, questions whether the Tax Court actually held reg. section 301.6235-1(b)(2) was invalid and discusses the impact the opinion has on tax certainty.
Latest Articles
Insights
Published July 30, 2026
We Can't Have Security Rules for Everything
Read More
Insights
Published July 23, 2026
The Decision-Grade Data Gap: Why Finance Teams Struggle to Trust Their Numbers
Read More
Insights
Published July 23, 2026
How Salesforce Business Analysts Can Design for High User Adoption from Day One
Read More
Insights
Published July 22, 2026
Salesforce Security in 2026: Key Changes That Reduce Risk and Strengthen Trust
Read More


