Insights
Hindsight is 20/20: JM Assets and the Blow to Tax Certainty
Published on July 17, 2025
5 minute read
As seen in Procedurally Taxing - Tax Notes Federal
In this article, the first of a two-part series, Managing Director Jenni Black examines the Tax Court opinion in JM Assets, and she argues that by determining reg. section 301.6235-1(b)(2)(i) is “invalid,” the court opinion removes quite a bit of certainty for both taxpayers and the government.
Explore the second article of the series as Jenni continues her examination of JM Assets LP, questions whether the Tax Court actually held reg. section 301.6235-1(b)(2) was invalid and discusses the impact the opinion has on tax certainty.
Latest Articles
Insights
Published September 16, 2026
Treasury and IRS Propose Regulations on Racial Nondiscrimination Requirements for Private Schools
Read More
Insights
Published September 16, 2026
Part 2: Risk Management as a Value Creation Lever: Measuring Risk's Impact on Enterprise Value
Read More
Insights
Published September 16, 2026
Part 1: Risk Management as a Value Creation Lever: Why Private Equity is Rethinking Risk
Read More
Insights
Published September 16, 2026
Growing Through Acquisition? Make Sure Your Back Office Can Keep Up
Read More


